August 8, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
Women at Risk By BOB HERBERT
“I actually look good. I dress good, am clean-shaven, bathe, touch of cologne — yet 30 million women rejected me,” wrote George Sodini in a blog that he kept while preparing for this week’s shooting in a Pennsylvania gym in which he killed three women, wounded nine others and then killed himself.
We’ve seen this tragic ritual so often that it has the feel of a formula. A guy is filled with a seething rage toward women and has easy access to guns. The result: mass slaughter.
Back in the fall of 2006, a fiend invaded an Amish schoolhouse in rural Pennsylvania, separated the girls from the boys, and then shot 10 of the girls, killing five.
I wrote, at the time, that there would have been thunderous outrage if someone had separated potential victims by race or religion and then shot, say, only the blacks, or only the whites, or only the Jews. But if you shoot only the girls or only the women — not so much of an uproar.
According to police accounts, Sodini walked into a dance-aerobics class of about 30 women who were being led by a pregnant instructor. He turned out the lights and opened fire. The instructor was among the wounded.
We have become so accustomed to living in a society saturated with misogyny that the barbaric treatment of women and girls has come to be more or less expected.
We profess to being shocked at one or another of these outlandish crimes, but the shock wears off quickly in an environment in which the rape, murder and humiliation of females is not only a staple of the news, but an important cornerstone of the nation’s entertainment.
The mainstream culture is filled with the most gruesome forms of misogyny, and pornography is now a multibillion-dollar industry — much of it controlled by mainstream U.S. corporations.
One of the striking things about mass killings in the U.S. is how consistently we find that the killers were riddled with shame and sexual humiliation, which they inevitably blamed on women and girls. The answer to their feelings of inadequacy was to get their hands on a gun (or guns) and begin blowing people away.
What was unusual about Sodini was how explicit he was in his blog about his personal shame and his hatred of women. “Why do this?” he asked. “To young girls? Just read below.” In his gruesome, monthslong rant, he managed to say, among other things: “It seems many teenage girls have sex frequently. One 16 year old does it usually three times a day with her boyfriend. So, err, after a month of that, this little [expletive] has had more sex than ME in my LIFE, and I am 48. One more reason.”
I was reminded of the Virginia Tech gunman, Seung-Hui Cho, who killed 32 people in a rampage at the university in 2007. While Cho shot males as well as females, he was reported to have previously stalked female classmates and to have leaned under tables to take inappropriate photos of women. A former roommate said Cho once claimed to have seen “promiscuity” when he looked into the eyes of a woman on campus.
Soon after the Virginia Tech slayings, I interviewed Dr. James Gilligan, who spent many years studying violence as a prison psychiatrist in Massachusetts and as a professor at Harvard and N.Y.U. “What I’ve concluded from decades of working with murderers and rapists and every kind of violent criminal,” he said, “is that an underlying factor that is virtually always present to one degree or another is a feeling that one has to prove one’s manhood, and that the way to do that, to gain the respect that has been lost, is to commit a violent act.”
Life in the United States is mind-bogglingly violent. But we should take particular notice of the staggering amounts of violence brought down on the nation’s women and girls each and every day for no other reason than who they are. They are attacked because they are female.
A girl or woman somewhere in the U.S. is sexually assaulted every couple of minutes or so. The number of seriously battered wives and girlfriends is far beyond the ability of any agency to count.
There were so many sexual attacks against women in the armed forces that the Defense Department had to revise its entire approach to the problem.
We would become much more sane, much healthier, as a society if we could bring ourselves to acknowledge that misogyny is a serious and pervasive problem, and that the twisted way so many men feel about women, combined with the absurdly easy availability of guns, is a toxic mix of the most tragic proportions.
For daily notes; adjunct to calendar; in lieu of handwriting notes in Day-Timer
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(223)
-
▼
August
(26)
- ANNALS OF EDUCATION THE RUBBER ROOM The battle ove...
- Missing Richard Nixon By PAUL KRUGMAN
- Who’s Driving Twitter’s Popularity? Not Teens By C...
- 5 Myths About Health Care Around the World By T.R....
- Adding Layers of Skills to a Science Background By...
- Study Finds That Online Education Beats the Classr...
- The Swiss Menace By PAUL KRUGMAN
- Books: A plan to scan By Richard Waters in San Fra...
- Ring the changes on conference calls By Rhymer Rigby
- Gwathmey’s Death Further Diminishes ‘New York Five...
- Presidential Horse Race, the 2008 Version By MICHI...
- OUTSTANDING SCIENCE BOOKS
- Lunch with the FT: Jared Diamond By David Pilling
- It’s Time to Stay the Courier By JOE NOCERA
- Women at Risk By BOB HERBERT
- Health Care Hullabaloo By CHARLES M. BLOW
- Mother's Sausage Balls
- Mother's Bacon-Wrapped Crackers Canapes
- Tomato Pie Recipe....DMN
- Why the case for assisted dying is unanswerable By...
- The Town Hall Mob By PAUL KRUGMAN
- Microsoft’s SharePoint Thrives in the Recession By...
- Hot Story to Has-Been: Tracking News via Cyberspac...
- Obama Administration Weighs in on State Secrets, R...
- A Canadian Whirlwind Hits Town By MATTHEW GUREWITSCH
- The Death of Journalism (Gawker Edition)By Ian Sha...
-
▼
August
(26)
No comments:
Post a Comment